|
მელ გიბსონის ამ ნამუშევარმა ძალიან დიდი კამათი და კრიტიკა გამოიწვია, გაკეთდა უამრავი არაერთგვაროვანი განხილვა. ზოგიერთი კრიტიკოსის მტკიცებით, გადამეტებული ძალადობის სცენები ხელს უშლის იმას, რომ ფილმის მთავარი სათქმელი მაყურებლამდე მივიდეს. დაისვა კითხვა იმაზე, არის თუ არა უტყუარი ის არაბიბლიური კათოლიკური მასალა, რომელიც გამოყენებულია ფილმში. მიუხედავად ამ ყველაფრისა, ეს ფილმი იყო მთავარი კომერციული ჰიტი, რომლის შემოსავალმა, ჯერ კიდევ კინოთეატრებში ჩვენების დროს, მიაღწია 600 მილიონ აშშ დოლარზე მეტს. ამიტომ ის გახდა ყველაზე დიდი შემოსავლის მქონე R-რეიტინგის '''(17 წელს ქვევით მყოფი მოზარდებისთვის არ არის მიზანშეწონილი მეურვის თანხლების გარეშე R-რეიტინგის ფილმის ყურება)''' ფილმი აშშ-ში და ყველა დროის ყველაზე დიდი შემოსავლის მქონე არაინგლისურენოვანი კინემატოგრაფიული ნამუშევარი.
==სიუჟეტი==
The film opens in [[Gethsemane]] as Jesus prays and is tempted by [[Satan]], while his apostles, [[Saint Peter|Peter]], [[James, son of Zebedee|James]] and [[John the Apostle|John]] sleep. After receiving thirty pieces of silver, one of Jesus' other apostles, [[Judas Iscariot|Judas]], approaches with the temple guards and betrays Jesus with a kiss on the cheek. As the guards move in to arrest Jesus, Peter cuts off the ear of [[Malchus]], but Jesus heals the ear. As the apostles flee, the temple guards arrest Jesus and beat him during the journey to the [[Sanhedrin]]. John tells [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary]] and [[Mary Magdalene]] of the arrest while Peter follows Jesus at a distance. [[Caiaphas]] holds trial over the objection of some of the other priests, who are expelled from the court. When questioned by Caiaphas whether he is the son of God, Jesus replies "I am." Caiaphas is horrified and tears his robes and Jesus is condemned to death for blasphemy. Peter, who is secretly watching, is confronted and three times [[Denial of Peter|denies knowing Jesus]], but then runs away sobbing after remembering that Jesus had foretold that. Meanwhile, the remorseful Judas attempts to return the money to have Jesus freed but is refused by the priests. Tormented by demons, he flees the city and hangs himself with a rope he finds on a dead donkey.
Caiaphas brings Jesus before [[Pontius Pilate]] to be condemned to death, but after questioning Jesus and finding no fault in him, Pilate sends him instead to the court of [[Herod Antipas|Herod]], as Jesus is from Herod's ruling town of Nazareth. After Jesus is again found not guilty and returned, Pilate offers the crowd that he will chastise Jesus and then will set him free. He then attempts to have Jesus freed by giving the people an option of freeing Jesus or the violent criminal [[Barabbas]]. To his dismay, the crowd demands to have Barabbas freed and Jesus killed. In an attempt to appease the crowd, Pilate has Jesus brutally scourged and mocked with a crown of thorns. However, the crowd continues to demand that Jesus be crucified, and Barabbas released. Pilate washes his hands and reluctantly orders Jesus' crucifixion.
As Jesus carries the cross along the [[Via Dolorosa]] to [[Calvary]], [[Saint Veronica|Veronica]] wipes Jesus' face with her [[Veil of Veronica|veil]]. [[Simon of Cyrene]] is unwillingly pressed into carrying the cross with Jesus. Jesus is then [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucified]]. As he hangs from the cross, Jesus prays forgiveness for those who did this to him and redeems a [[Saint Dismas|criminal]] crucified next to him. After Jesus gives up his spirit and dies, a single drop of rain falls from the sky, triggering an earthquake which destroys the Temple and rips the cloth covering the [[Holy of Holies]] in two, to the horror of Caiaphas and the other priests. Satan is then shown screaming in defeat. Jesus is taken down from the cross. In the end, Jesus [[Resurrection of Jesus|rises from the dead]] and exits the tomb.
==როლებში==
* [[იესო ქრისტე]] — [[ჯეიმზ კევიზელი]]
* [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary]] — [[Maia Morgenstern]]
* [[Mary Magdalene]] — [[Monica Bellucci]]
* [[Satan]] — [[Rosalinda Celentano]]
* [[Saint Peter|Peter]] — Francesco DeVito
* [[James, son of Zebedee|James]] — Chokri Ben Zagden
* [[John the Apostle|John]] — Christo Jivkov
* [[Judas Iscariot]] — [[Luca Lionello]]
* [[Pontius Pilate]] — [[Hristo Shopov]]
* [[Saint Procula|Claudia Procles]] — [[Claudia Gerini]]
* Abenader — Fabio Sartor
* [[Herod Antipas|Herod Ántipas]] — [[Luca De Dominicis]]
* [[Caiaphas]] — [[Mattia Sbragia]]
* [[Annas|Annas ben Seth]] — [[Toni Bertorelli]]
* [[Simon of Cyrene]] — Jarreth Merz
* [[Saint Dismas|Dismas]] — [[Sergio Rubini]]
* [[Gestas|Gesmas]] — [[Francesco Cabras]]
* [[Saint Longinus|Cassius]] — Giovanni Capalbo
* [[Malchus]] — Roberto Bestazoni
* [[Saint Veronica|Seraphia]] — Sabrina Impacciatore
* [[Barabbas]] — Pietro Sarubbi
* [[Janus]] — Matt Patresi
* Scornful Roman 1 — [[Emilio De Marchi]]
* Scornful Roman 2 — Roberto Visconti
* Brutish Roman — Lello Giulivo
==ფილმის მთავარი თემა==
In ''The Passion: Photography from the Movie "The Passion of the Christ"'', Gibson says: "This is a movie about love, hope, faith and forgiveness. He [Jesus] died for all mankind, suffered for all of us. It's time to get back to that basic message. The world has gone nuts. We could all use a little more love, faith, hope and forgiveness."
==გამოყენებული მასალა==
===ახალი აღთქმა===
According to director [[Mel Gibson]], the primary source material for ''The Passion of the Christ'' is the four [[Gospel]] narratives of Christ's [[Passion (Christianity)|passion]]. The film also draws from other parts of the [[New Testament]]. The portion spoken by Jesus in the film, "I make all things new," is found in the [[Book of Revelation]].<ref>{{cite book
| title = The Holy Bible, Book of Revelation 21:5 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2021:5;&version=31}}</ref>
===ებრაული ბიბლია===
''The Passion of the Christ'' also refers to the [[Hebrew Bible]]. The film begins with an [[Epigraph (literature)|epigraph]] from the [[Isaiah 53|Fourth Song of the Suffering Servant]] from [[Book of Isaiah|Isaiah]].<ref>{{cite book | title=The Holy Bible, Book of Isaiah 53:5 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2053:5;&version=31}}</ref> In the opening scene set in the [[Garden of Gethsemane]], Jesus crushes a serpent's head in direct visual allusion to [[Book of Genesis|Genesis]] 3:15.<ref>{{cite book | title=The Holy Bible, Book of Genesis 3:15 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%203:15;&version=31}}</ref> Throughout the film, Jesus quotes from the [[Psalms]], beyond the instances recorded in the [[New Testament]].
===Traditional iconography and stories===
Many of the depictions in ''The Passion of the Christ'' deliberately mirror traditional representations of the [[Passion (Christianity)|Passion]] in art. For example, the fourteen [[Stations of the Cross]] are central to the depiction of the [[Via Dolorosa]] in ''The Passion of the Christ.'' All of the stations are portrayed except for the eighth station (Jesus meets the women of [[Jerusalem]], a deleted scene on the DVD) and the fourteenth station (Jesus is laid in the tomb). Gibson was also visually inspired by the representation of Jesus on the [[Shroud of Turin]].<ref name="Urbancinefile" >{{cite web | last = Cooney Carrillo | first = Jenny | title = The Passion of Mel | publisher = Urbancinefile | date = February 26, 2004| url = http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=8559&s=Interviews }}</ref>
At the suggestion of actress [[Maia Morgenstern]], the [[Passover Seder]] is quoted early in the film. [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary]] asks "Why is this night different than other nights?", and [[Mary Magdalene]] replies with the traditional response: "Because once we were slaves and we are slaves no longer".<ref>{{cite news | last = Abramowitz | first = Rachel | title = Along came Mary; Mel Gibson was sold on Maia Morgenstern for 'Passion' at first sight | publisher = [[Los Angeles Times]] | date = March 7, 2004 | url = http://articles.latimes.com/2004/mar/07/entertainment/ca-encounter7}}</ref>
The conflation of Mary Magdalene with the [[Jesus and the woman taken in adultery|adulteress saved from stoning]] by Jesus has some precedent in tradition but according to the director was done for [[artistic license|dramatic reasons]]. The names of some of the characters in the film are traditional and extra-Scriptural, such as the thieves crucified alongside the Christ, [[Dismas]] and Gesmas (also [[Gestas]]).
===Catholic devotional writings===
Screenwriters [[Mel Gibson]] and [[Benedict Fitzgerald]] said that they read many accounts of Christ's [[Passion (Christianity)|Passion]] for inspiration, including the devotional writings of Roman Catholic mystics. A principal source is ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ''<ref name=dolorous>{{cite book | url=http://www.jesus-passion.com/DOLOROUS_PASSION_OF_OUR_LORD_JESUS_CHRIST.htm | title=The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ | author=Clement Brentano}}</ref> the reported (yet disputed) visions of the [[stigmatic]] German nun [[Anne Catherine Emmerich]] (1774–1824), as written by the poet [[Clemens Brentano]].<ref name=Corl /><ref name="Garcia"/><ref name=Dimare /> A careful reading of Emmerich's book shows the film's high level of dependence on it.<ref name="Corl"/><ref name="Garcia"/><ref>''Movies in American History: An Encyclopedia'' edited by Philip C. DiMare 2011 ISBN 1-59884-296-X page 909</ref>
However, [[Clemens Brentano]]'s attribution of the book ''The Dolorous Passion'' to Emmerich has been subject to dispute, with allegations that Brentano wrote much of the book himself; a Vatican investigation concluding that: "It is absolutely not certain that she ever wrote this".<ref name=Anvil >Emmerich, Anne Catherine, and Clemens Brentano. ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ''. Anvil Publishers, Georgia, 2005 pages 49–56</ref><ref name=CNSFeb2004 >John Thavis, ''Catholic News Service'' February 4, 2004: "Vatican confirms papal plans to beatify nun who inspired Gibson film" [http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/20040616y.htm]</ref><ref name=CNSOct2004 >John Thavis, ''Catholic News Service'' October 4, 2004: "Pope beatifies five, including German nun who inspired Gibson film" [http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0405425.htm]</ref> In his review of the movie in the Catholic publication ''[[America Magazine|America]]'', [[Jesuit]] priest John O' Malley used the terms "devout fiction" and "well-intentioned fraud" to refer to the writings of Clemens Brentano.<ref name=America /><ref name=Anvil />
Among the many elements taken from the Dolorous Passion are scenes such as the suspension of Jesus from a bridge after his arrest by the Temple guards, the torment of Judas by demons after he had handed over Jesus to the Sanhedrin, the wiping up of the blood of Jesus after his scourging, and the dislocation of Jesus’ shoulder so that his palm would reach the hole bored for the nail.<ref name=dolorous />
==Differences from traditional Passion story==
Certain elements of ''The Passion of the Christ'' do not have precedent in earlier depictions of the [[Passion (Christianity)|Passion]]. In the [[Garden of Gethsemane]] scene at the beginning of the movie, Satan appears and attempts to distract Jesus while he is praying. Jesus then crushes a serpent beneath his heel (this is a reference to the protoevangelium, Genesis 3:15 – a prophecy of Messiah); this does not occur in any of the gospels. In another example, [[Judas Iscariot]] is tormented by demons who appear as children to him. The film gives focus to the fragile relationship of [[Tiberius|Tiberius Caesar]] with [[Pontius Pilate]] through Pilate's discussion with [[Saint Procula|his wife]] about imperial orders to avert further Judean revolts. The movie clearly identifies [[Simon of Cyrene]] as Jewish, although the [[Synoptic Gospels]] provide only his name and place of origin. In the film, a Roman soldier derides Simon (who helps Jesus bear the cross) by derisively calling him ''Jew''. In contrast, Simon is described as a pagan in ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ''.<ref name=dolorous />
Other scenes unique to ''The Passion of the Christ'' include the one in which the crucified thief who taunted Jesus has his eye pecked out by a crow, and the flashback of the carpenter Jesus building an elevated, four-legged table for a [[Roman Empire|Roman]]. The scene of Satan carrying a demonic baby during Christ’s flogging has been construed as a perversion of traditional depictions of the [[Madonna and Child]]. Mel Gibson described this scene as follows:
<blockquote>"...it's evil distorting what’s good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child? So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little bit. Instead of a normal mother and child you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old ‘baby’ with hair on his back. It is weird, it is shocking, it's almost too much – just like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby takes place."<ref>{{cite news | last = Moring | first = Mark | title = What's Up With the Ugly Baby? | publisher = ''[[Christianity Today]]'' | date=March 1, 2004 | url = http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/040301-passion.html | accessdate = 2008-08-20 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080709113146/http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/040301-passion.html |archivedate = July 9, 2008}}</ref></blockquote>
==Production==
===Script and language===
Gibson originally announced that he would use two [[language death#Dead languages and normal language change|old languages]] without subtitles and rely on "filmic storytelling." Because the story of the [[Passion (Christianity)|Passion]] is so well known, Gibson felt the need to avoid [[vernacular]] languages in order to surprise audiences: "I think it's almost counterproductive to say some of these things in a [[modern language]]. It makes you want to stand up and shout out the next line, like when you hear 'To be or not to be' and you instinctively say to yourself, 'That is the question.'"<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.zenit.org/article-6723?l=english| title= Mel Gibson’s Great Passion| publisher=Zenit | date=March 6, 2003}}</ref> The script was written in English by Gibson and [[Benedict Fitzgerald]], then [[translation|translated]] by [[William Fulco]], S.J., a professor at [[Loyola Marymount University]], into [[Latin]], reconstructed [[Aramaic]], and [[Hebrew]]. Gibson chose to use [[Latin]] instead of [[Koine Greek|Greek]], which was the [[lingua franca]] of that particular part of the [[Roman Empire]] at the time, so that the audience could easily distinguish between the sound of Italianate [[Latin]] and Semitic [[Aramaic]].<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.ntgateway.com/weblog/2004/11/sbl-passion-of-christ-interview-fulco.html| title= SBL Passion of the Christ interview – Fulco and Fitzgerald| author= Mark Goodacre| publisher=NT Gateway Weblog | date=November 26, 2004}}</ref> Fulco sometimes incorporated deliberate errors in pronunciations and word endings when the characters were speaking a language unfamiliar to them, and some of the crude language used by the Roman soldiers was not translated in the subtitles.<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.languagehat.com/archives/001196.php| title= Translating the pasion| publisher=Language Hat | date=March 8, 2004}}</ref> The pronunciation of Latin in the film is closer to ecclesiastical Latin than to so-called "classical" Latin. (Clear instances of this can be heard when Pontius Pilate says "veritas" and "ecce".)
===Filming===
The film was produced [[Independent film|independently]] and filmed in Italy – primarily at [[Cinecittà|Cinecittà Studios]] in Rome, and in the old city of [[Matera, Italy|Matera]], and at [[Craco]] ([[Basilicata]]).<ref name="Reeves (2011)">{{cite web| last = Reeves| first = Tony| title = The Passion of the Christ film locations| publisher = [[The Worldwide Guide To Movie Locations]]| date = February 2, 2012| url = http://www.movie-locations.com/movies/p/Passion_Of_The_Christ.html| accessdate = February 18, 2012 }}</ref> The estimated US$30 million production cost, plus an additional estimated $15 million in marketing costs, were fully borne by Gibson and his company, [[Icon Productions]]. It was released on [[Ash Wednesday]], February 25, 2004. It was rated R by the [[Motion Picture Association of America]] for "sequences of graphic violence". [[Icon Entertainment]] distributed the theatrical version of the film, and [[20th Century Fox]] distributed the VHS/DVD/Blu-ray version of the film.
Gibson consulted several theological advisors during filming, including [[Jonathan Morris (priest)|Fr. Jonathan Morris]]. During filming, assistant director Jan Michelini was struck twice by [[lightning]]. Minutes later, [[Jim Caviezel]] was also struck.<ref>{{cite web|last=Susman|first=Gary|title=Charged Performance|url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,525927,00.html|accessdate=March 31, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Ross|first=Scott|title=Behind the Scenes of 'The Passion' with Jim Caviezel|url=http://www.cbn.com/700club/guests/interviews/scottross-jim_caviezel_2.aspx|accessdate=March 31, 2013}}</ref><ref name="bbc-lightning">{{cite news|title=Jesus actor struck by lightning |work=BBC News |date=October 23, 2003 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3209223.stm |accessdate=April 14, 2013}}</ref>
===Music===
Three CDs were released with [[Mel Gibson]]'s co-operation: (i) the [[The Passion of the Christ (soundtrack)|film soundtrack]] of [[John Debney]]'s original orchestral score conducted by [[Nick Ingman]]; (ii) ''[[The Passion of the Christ: Songs]]'', by producers [[Mark Joseph (producer)|Mark Joseph]] and Tim Cook, with original compositions by various artists, and (iii) ''The Passion of the Christ: Songs Inspired By''. The first two albums each received a [[Dove Awards of 2005|2005 Dove award]], and the soundtrack received an [[Academy Award]] nomination of [[Academy Award for Best Original Music Score|Best Music Score]].
A preliminary score was composed and recorded by [[Lisa Gerrard]] and [[Patrick Cassidy (composer)|Patrick Cassidy]], but was incomplete at film's release. [[Jack Lenz]] was the primary musical researcher and one of the composers;<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.jacklenz.com/index.htm | title= Jack Lenz Bio | publisher=JackLenz.com}}</ref> several clips of his compositions have been posted online.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.jacklenz.com/clips.htm |title=Clips of Musical Compositions by Jack Lenz | publisher=JackLenz.com}}</ref>
==Post-production==
===Title change===
Although Gibson wanted to call his film ''The Passion'', on October 16, 2003, his spokesman announced that the title used in the United States would be ''The Passion of Christ'' because [[Miramax Films]] had already registered the title ''The Passion'' with the [[Motion Picture Association of America|MPAA]] for the 1987 novel by [[Jeanette Winterson]].<ref>{{cite web | last = Susman | first = Gary | title = Napoleon Branding | publisher = “Entertainment Weekly” | date = October 16, 2004 | url = http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,519051,00.html | accessdate =2008-08-16 }}</ref> Later, the title was changed again to ''The Passion of the Christ'' for all markets.
===Distribution and marketing===
Gibson began production on his film without securing outside funding or distribution. In 2002, he explained why he could not get backing from the Hollywood studios: "This is a film about something that nobody wants to touch, shot in two dead languages. In Los Angeles they think I am insane, and maybe I am."<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.allbusiness.com/services/motion-pictures/4866159-1.html| title= Gibson To Direct Christ Tale With Caviezel As Star| author= Nick Vivarelli| publisher=The Hollywood Reporter | date=September 23, 2002| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> Gibson and his [[Icon Productions]] company provided the film's sole backing, spending about $30 million on production costs and an estimated $15 million on marketing.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.forbes.com/2004/03/03/cx_pp_0303mel.html | title=What Mel's Passion Will Earn Him | publisher=Forbes.com | date=March 3, 2004 | last=Patsuris | first=Penelope}}</ref> After early accusations of anti-Semitism, it became difficult for Gibson to find an American distribution company. [[20th Century Fox]] had a first-look deal with Icon and passed on the film in response to public protests.<ref name=FOXpass>{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2003/aug/30/entertainment/et-quick30.2| title= Fox passes on Gibson’s ‘The Passion’| publisher=Los Angeles Times | date=October 22, 2004| accessdate=2008-08-30}}</ref> In order to avoid the spectacle of other studios turning down the film and to avoid subjecting the distributor to the same intense public criticism he had received, Gibson decided to distribute the movie in the United States himself, with [[Newmarket Films]].<ref>{{cite news | url= http://articles.latimes.com/2003/oct/22/business/fi-mel22| title= Gibson to Market ‘Christ’ on His Own, Sources Say| last=Horn | first=John| publisher=Los Angeles Times | date=October 22, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref>
Gibson departed from the usual film marketing formula. He employed a small-scale television advertising campaign, and added faith guru Rick Hendrix with no press junkets.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4374411 | title=Marketing 'The Passion of the Christ' | publisher=MSNBC.com | last=Cobb | first=Jerry | date=February 25, 2004}}</ref> Yet ''The Passion of the Christ'' was heavily promoted by many church groups, both within their organizations and to the general public, often giving away free tickets.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usask.ca/relst/jrpc/art8-melgibsonmarketing.html | title=Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ: Market Segmentation, Mass Marketing and Promotion, and the Internet | publisher=The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture | last=Maresco | first=Peter A. | date=Fall 2004}}</ref>
====Christian support====
''The Passion of the Christ'' received support and endorsement from most known evangelical leaders and representatives of USA's conservative church organizations: [[Billy Graham]], [[James Dobson]], Mission America Coalition, [[Salvation Army]], [[Promise Keepers]], [[National Association of Evangelicals]], [[Campus Crusade for Christ]], [[Focus on the Family]], [[Pat Robertson]], [[Southern Baptist Theological Seminary]], [[Trinity Broadcasting Network]], [[Rick Warren]], [[Southern Baptist Convention]], [[Jerry Falwell]], [[Max Lucado]], [[Young Life]], [[Tim LaHaye]], [[Chuck Colson]], [[Lee Strobel]], [[Northern Baptist Theological Seminary]], [[Mothers of Preschoolers]] (MOPS), [[Seventh-day Adventist Church]].<ref>{{cite web | title = Comments about Mel Gibsons the Passion of the Christ | url = http://www.seekgod.ca/gibsoncomments.htm | accessdate =2008-04-10 }}{{Self-published inline|date=July 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.adventist.org/en/archive/articles/2004/02/24/ann-news-analysis-adventists-and-the-passion-of-the-christ |title=ANN News Analysis: Adventists and ''The Passion of the Christ'' |publisher=News.adventist.org |date=2004-02-24 |accessdate=2013-04-24}}</ref> The [[United Methodist Church]] stated that many of its members, like other Christians, felt that the movie was a good way to [[evangelize]] non-believers.<ref name="UMNS">{{cite web|url = http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=3316| title = Many churches look to 'Passion' as evangelism tool|publisher = [[United Methodist Church]]|accessdate = 2009-06-07}}</ref> As a result, many congregations planned to be at the theaters, some of whom set up tables to answer questions and share [[Prayer in Christianity|prayers]].<ref name="UMNS"/>{{quote|They feel the film presents a unique opportunity to share Christianity in a way today’s public can identify with.|Rev. John Tanner|[[Elder (Methodism)|pastor]] of Cove United Methodist Church, Hampton Cove, Alabama<ref name="UMNS"/>}}
An unofficial sequel to ''The Passion'' is being produced to portray the rest of the story of Jesus as described in the Bible, including him [[Resurrection of Jesus|coming out of the tomb]] and the forty days that lead up to [[Ascension of Jesus|his ascension into Heaven]]. The film is titled ''[[The Resurrection (film)|The Resurrection]]'' and is slated for release on Easter 2015.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.christianpost.com/news/the-resurrection-hollywood-producer-aims-for-gods-sequel-to-the-passion-72127/ |title='The Resurrection:' Hollywood Producer Aims for God's Sequel to 'The Passion' |date=March 27, 2012 |work=[[The Christian Post]] |last=Murashko |first=Alex |accessdate=January 27, 2013}}</ref>
==Release==
;Domestic
The film opened in the United States on February 25, 2004 ([[Ash Wednesday]], the beginning of [[Lent]]). It earned $83,848,082 in its opening weekend, ranking it 4th overall in domestic opening weekend earnings for 2004. It went on to earn $370,782,930 overall in the United States.<ref name="BOM">{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=passionofthechrist.htm |title=The Passion of the Christ (2004) |publisher=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=2009-02-05}}</ref>
;International
In Malaysia, government [[censorship|censor]]s initially banned it completely, but after Christian leaders protested, the restriction was lifted, but only for Christian audiences, allowing them to view the film in specially designated theatres.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://articles.latimes.com/2004/jul/10/entertainment/et-quick10| title= Censors in Malaysia give OK to ‘Passion’| publisher=Los Angeles Times| date=July 10, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> In Israel, the film was not banned. However, it never received theatrical distribution because no Israeli distributor sought to market the movie.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://articles.latimes.com/2004/mar/15/entertainment/et-king15| title= ‘Passion’ goes unseen in Israel| author= Laura King| publisher=Los Angeles Times| date=March 15, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref>
Despite the various controversies and refusals of certain governments to allow the film to be viewed in wide release, ''The Passion of the Christ'' earned $611,899,420 worldwide.<ref name="BOM"/> The movie was also a relative success in certain countries with large Muslim populations,<ref name=CSM>{{cite web | url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0409/p01s02-wome.html | title=Gibson's movie unlikely box-office hit in Arab world | publisher=The Christian Science Monitor | date=April 9, 2004 | last=Blanford | first=Nicholas }}</ref> such as in Egypt, where it ranked 20th overall in its box office numbers for 2004.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/intl/egypt/yearly/?yr=2004&p=.htm| title=2004 Box Office Totals for Egypt | publisher=BoxOfficeMojo.com}}</ref>
===Theatrical re-release===
An edited version titled ''The Passion Recut'' was released on March 11, 2005, with five minutes of the most explicit violence deleted to broaden the audience for the film. Gibson explained his reasoning for the new version of the film: <blockquote>After the initial run in movie theaters, I received numerous letters from people all across the country. Many told me they wanted to share the experience with loved ones but were concerned that the harsher images of the film would be too intense for them to bear. In light of this I decided to re-edit The Passion of the Christ.<ref name=pluggedin>{{cite web | url=http://www.pluggedinonline.com/movies/movies/a0001657.cfm | title=The Passion of the Christ Review | publisher=PluggedInOnline.com}}</ref></blockquote>
Despite the attempt to tone down the content, the [[Motion Picture Association of America]] deemed the film too violent to rate [[PG-13]], so Gibson released it as unrated.<ref name=pluggedin /> The re-release did not end up being a commercial success, only showing for three weeks before its poor box office results caused it to be pulled from theaters.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=passionrecut.htm | title=Box Office Stats for The Passion Recut | publisher=BoxOfficeMojo.com}}</ref>
===Home media===
{{Refimprove section|date=August 2010}}
On August 31, 2004, the film was released on DVD,<ref name="PassionoftheChristDVD">{{cite av media | title=The Passion of the Christ | url=http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/55205651 | oclc=55205651 | publisher=20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, ©2004 | location=Beverly Hills, California | first=Mel | last=Gibson | isbn= 9780310263661 | media=DVD | type=visual material | language=Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew dialog with subtitles, etc | laysummary=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335345/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1 | laysource=Internet Movie Database | accessdate=March 29, 2013}}</ref> VHS, and later [[D-VHS]] in North America by [[20th Century Fox Home Entertainment]]. As with the original theatrical release, the film's release on home video formats proved to be very popular. Early reports indicated that over 2.4 million copies of the film were sold by the middle of the day. The film was available on DVD with English and Spanish subtitles, and on VHS tape with English subtitles. On February 17, 2009, the film was released on [[Blu-ray Disc|Blu-ray]] in North America as a two-disc Definitive Edition set.<ref name="PassionoftheChristBlu-ray">{{cite av media | title=The Passion of the Christ | url=http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/302426419 | oclc=302426419 | publisher=20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, ©2009 | edition=definitive | location=Beverly Hills, California | first=Mel | last=Gibson | media=Blu-ray | type=visual material | language=Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew dialog with subtitles, etc | laysummary=http://www.amazon.com/Passion-Christ-Definitive-Edition-Blu-ray/dp/B001JNNDGA/ | laysource=Amazon | accessdate=March 29, 2013}}</ref> It was also released on Blu-ray in Australia a week before Easter.
Although the original DVD release sold well, it contained no extra materials other than soundtrack language selections. The no-frills edition provoked speculation about when a [[special edition]] would be released. On Tuesday, January 30, 2007, a two-disc Definitive Edition of ''The Passion of the Christ'' was released in the American markets, and March 26 elsewhere. It contains several documentaries, soundtrack [[Audio commentary|commentaries]], [[deleted scene]]s, [[outtake]]s, the 2005 [[re-edited film|unrated]] version, and the original 2004 theatrical version.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.miserere.org/m/archivedposts/175 | title=Re-Release of The Passion | publisher=Miserere.org}}</ref>
The British version of the two-disc DVD contains two deleted scenes. In the first deleted scene, Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem which is the eighth station of the cross, Jesus falls to the ground as the women wail around him and Simon of Cyrene attempts to hold up the cross and help up Jesus simultaneously. Afterwards, while both are holding up the cross, Jesus says to the women weeping for him, "Do not weep for me, but for yourselves and for your children". In the second scene Pilate washes his hands and turns to Caiaphas and says "Look you to it" (ie: the Pharisees wish to have him crucified). Pilate turns to Abanader and says "Do as they wish". The scene then shows Pilate calling to his servant who is carrying a wooden board on which Pilate writes 'Jesus of Nazareth king of the Jews' in Latin and Hebrew. He then holds the board above his head in full view of Caiaphas, who after reading it challenges Pilate on its content. Pilate replies (...) angrily to Caiaphas in Aramaic (content not translated). The disc contains only two deleted scenes in total. No other scenes from the movie are shown on disc 2.<ref>{{cite web|author=Reviewed by Stella Papamichael |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/03/19/the_passion_of_the_christ_special_edition_dvd_2007_review.shtml |title=Movies – review – The Passion of the Christ: Special Edition DVD |publisher=BBC |date= |accessdate=2012-06-05}}</ref>
===Television broadcast===
On April 17, 2011 ([[Palm Sunday]]), [[Trinity Broadcasting Network]] (TBN) presented a world television premiere of the film at 7:30 pm ET/PT, with multiple showings scheduled. The network has continued to air the film throughout the year, and particularly around Easter.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tbn.org/watch-us/our-programs/the-passion-of-the-christ |title=The Passion of the Christ |publisher=TBN |date= |accessdate=2012-06-05}}</ref> TBN presents the film completely unedited; as a result, it is rated [[TV Parental Guidelines|TV-MA]] (for graphic violence).
On March 29, 2013 ([[Good Friday]]), as a part of their special [[Holy Week]] programming, [[TV5 (Philippines)|TV5]] presented the Filipino-dubbed version of the film at 2:00 pm ([[Philippine Standard Time|PST]], [[UTC+8]]) in the Philippines. Its total broadcast ran for two hours, but excluding the advertisements, it would only run up for approximately 1 hour instead of its full run time of 2 hours and 9 minutes.It was ended exactly 3:00 p.m. for it is the time of the [[Crucifixion of Jesus]]. TV5 continued to present this reduced content. It has been rated SPG by the [[MTRCB]] for themes, language and violence.
TV5 is the first broadcast outside of the [[United States]] and its translated via the subtitles English to [[Filipino Language]].
==Reception==
===Critical reviews===
The film received mixed reviews from critics; although the performance of [[Jim Caviezel]] as Jesus was praised, it was criticized for its graphic violence. The review aggregator [[Rotten Tomatoes]] reported that 49% gave the film positive reviews, based on 266 reviews total; with the consensus that "the graphic details of Jesus' [[torture]] make the movie tough to sit through and obscure whatever message it is trying to convey."<ref name=tomatoes >{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/passion_of_the_christ/ |title=The Passion of the Christ Movie Reviews, Pictures – Rotten Tomatoes |accessdate=2008-07-16 |publisher=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]}}</ref> [[Metacritic]] reported the film had an average score of 47 out of 100, based on 43 reviews.<ref name=metacritic >{{cite web|url=http://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/passionofthechrist |title=Passion of the Christ, The (2004): Reviews |accessdate=2008-07-16 |publisher=[[Metacritic]]}}</ref>
[[Roger Ebert]] gave the film four out of four stars, and called it "the most violent film I have ever seen", also reflecting on how the movie personally impacted him as a former [[altar boy]].<ref name=Roger >{{cite news | last = Ebert | first = Roger | coauthors = | title = Movie Reviews: The Passion of the Christ | work = | pages = | publisher = Chicago Sun–Times |date=February 24, 2004 | url = http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040224/REVIEWS/402240301/1023 | accessdate = 2006-08-02 }}</ref> ''[[New York Press]]'' film critic [[Armond White]] praised Gibson's work, comparing him to [[Carl Theodor Dreyer|Dreyer]], for transforming Art into spirituality.<ref>White, Armond (2008-03-18). [http://www.nypress.com/article-19539-steve-mcqueens-hunger.html "Steve McQueen's Hunger"], ''[[New York Press]]''. Retrieved on 2009-04-16.</ref> However, ''[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]'' reviewer [[David Edelstein]] called it "a two-hour-and-six-minute [[Snuff film|snuff movie]],"<ref>{{cite news | first=David | last=Edelstein | coauthors= |authorlink= David Edelstein | title=Jesus H. Christ | date=February 24, 2004 | publisher= | url =http://slate.msn.com//id/2096025/ | work =[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] | pages = | accessdate = 2009-11-18 | language = }}</ref> while [[Jami Bernard]] of the ''[[New York Daily News]]'' called it "the most virulently anti-Semitic movie made since the German propaganda films of World War II." ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine listed it as one of the most violent films of all time.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2015869_2015874_2015850,00.html |title=Top 10 Ridiculously Violent Movies |author=Josh Sanburn |date=September 3, 2010 |publisher=''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]''}}</ref>
The June 2006 issue of ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' named ''The Passion of the Christ'' the most controversial film of all time, followed by [[Stanley Kubrick]]'s film ''[[A Clockwork Orange (film)|A Clockwork Orange]]''.<ref name=EW >{{Cite journal| title=Entertainment Weekly |date=June 2006}}</ref>
===Independent promotion and discussion===
A number of independent [[Web site|websites]] such as ''MyLifeAfter.com'' and ''Passion-Movie.com'' were launched to promote the film and its message and to allow people to discuss the film's effect on their lives. Documentaries such as ''Changed Lives: Miracles of the Passion'' chronicled stories of miraculous savings, forgiveness, new-found faith, and the story of a man who confessed to [[Homicide|murdering]] his girlfriend after authorities determined her death was due to suicide.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.scotsman.com/passionofchrist/Film-prompts-murder-confession.2515150.jp |title=Film prompts murder confession – Scotsman.com News |publisher=News.scotsman.com |date=March 27, 2004 |accessdate=2012-06-05}}</ref> Another documentary, ''Impact: The Passion of the Christ'', chronicled the popular response of the film in the United States, India, and Japan and examined the claims of antisemitism against Mel Gibson and the film.
===Accolades===
;Wins
* [[National Board of Review]], Award for Freedom of Expression (2004)
* [[People's Choice Awards]] – Favorite Motion Picture Drama (2004)
* [[Satellite Awards]] – [[Satellite Award for Best Director|Best Director]] – [[Mel Gibson]]
* [[Moviefone]] Moviegoer Awards – Best Picture
* [[Ethnic Multicultural Media Academy]] Award – Best Film Production
* [[Ethnic Multicultural Media Academy]] Award – Best Film Actress – [[Maia Morgenstern]]
* [[Motion Picture Sound Editors|Motion Picture Sound Editors, USA, Golden Reel Award]] – Best Sound Editing in a Feature Film – Music – Michael T. Ryan
* Golden Knight Film Festival – Grand Prix – [[Mel Gibson]]
* Golden Knight Film Festival – Best Actor – [[Hristo Shopov]]
* [[ShoWest]] / [[USA Today]] / [[Coca-Cola]] – Consumers Choice for Favorite Movie Award
* [[American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers]] –ASCAP Henry Mancini Award – [[John Debney]]
* [[Hollywood Film Festival]], USA – Hollywood Producer of the Year – [[Mel Gibson]]
* Catholics in Media Associates – Film Award – [[Mel Gibson]]
* Cinema Writers Circle Awards, Spain – Best Foreign Film
* [[GMA Dove Award]], ''The Passion of the Christ Original Motion Picture Soundtrack'', Instrumental Album of the Year (2004)
;Nominations
* [[Academy Awards]], USA – Oscar for ''[[Academy Award for Best Cinematography|Best Cinematography]]'' (2004) – [[Caleb Deschanel]]
* Academy Awards, USA – Oscar for ''[[Academy Award for Makeup|Best Makeup]]'' (2004) – [[Keith Vanderlaan]], [[Christien Tinsley]]
* Academy Awards, USA – Oscar for ''[[Academy Award for Original Music Score|Best Original Score]]'' (2004) – [[John Debney]]
* [[American Society of Cinematographers]], USA – ASC Award for ''Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography in Theatrical Releases'' (2004) – [[Caleb Deschanel]]
* [[Motion Picture Sound Editors]] Golden Reel Award for Best Sound Editing for Music in a Feature Film (2004)
* [[Broadcast Film Critics Association Awards]] – BFCA Award for ''Best Popular Movie'' (2004)
* [[Irish Film and Television Awards]] – Jameson People's Choice Award for Best International Film
* [[Motion Picture Sound Editors|Motion Picture Sound Editors, USA, Golden Reel Award]] – Best Sound Editing in Domestic Features – Dialogue & ADR
* [[MTV Movie Awards]] – Best male performance – [[James Caviezel]]
==Controversy==
===Questions of historical and biblical accuracy===
Despite criticisms that Gibson deliberately departed from historical accounts of first century Judea and Biblical accounts of Christ's crucifixion, some scholars defend the film as not meaning to be historically accurate. Biblical scholar [[Mark Goodacre]] protested that he could not find one documented example of Gibson explicitly claiming the film to be historically accurate.<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.ntgateway.com/weblog/2004/05/historical-accuracy-of-passion-of.html| title=Historical Accuracy of The Passion of the Christ | author= Mark Goodacre| date=May 2, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref><ref>Mark Goodacre, “The Power of The Passion: Reacting and Over-reacting to Gibson's Artistic Vision” in “Jesus and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. The Film, the Gospels and the Claims of History,” ed. Kathleen E. Corley and Robert L. Webb, 2004</ref> Gibson has been quoted as saying, "I think that my first duty is to be as faithful as possible in telling the story so that it doesn't contradict the Scriptures. Now, so long as it didn't do that, I felt that I had a pretty wide berth for artistic interpretation, and to fill in some of the spaces with logic, with imagination, with various other readings."<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/interviews/melgibson.html| title= 'Dude, That Was Graphic': Mel Gibson talks about The Passion of The Christ| author= David Neff and Jane Johnson Struck | publisher= Christianity Today | date=February 23, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080709100026/http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/interviews/melgibson.html |archivedate = July 9, 2008}}</ref>
In the film, Romans use Latin amongst themselves, Jews do the same with Aramaic, and the two groups adopt one or the other of these languages in communicating with each other. The latter is historically improbable, however, as the eastern parts of the Roman empire were extensively Hellenized, and Greek was the lingua franca.<ref>Longhenry, E.R ''[http://www.bible.ca/ef/topical-passion-of-christ-review.htm "The Passion of the Christ:" A Review]'' March 2004 retrieved September 3, 2010</ref>
When asked about the film's faithfulness to the account given in the New Testament, Father Augustine Di Noia of the [[Holy See|Vatican]]'s Doctrinal Congregation replied: "Mel Gibson's film is not a documentary but a work of artistic imagination" and "Gibson's film is entirely faithful to the New Testament."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zenit.org/article-8894?l=english |title=Mel Gibson's "Passion": On Review at the Vatican |publisher=ZENIT |date=December 8, 2003 |accessdate=2012-06-05}}</ref>
===Disputed papal endorsement===
In early December 2003, ''Passion of the Christ'' co-producer [[Stephen McEveety]] provided the film to Archbishop [[Stanislaw Dziwisz]], the pope's secretary. Archbishop Dziwisz returned the film to McEveety and said he had watched it with [[John Paul II]]. On December 16, ''[[Daily Variety]]'' reported that the pope had seen the film, and on Dec 17, ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' columnist [[Peggy Noonan]] reported that John Paul II had said: "It is as it was," sourcing McEveety, who said he heard it from Dziwisz.<ref name=noonan>{{cite news | url= http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004442| title= 'It Is as It Was' Mel Gibson's "The Passion" gets a thumbs-up from the pope. | author= Peggy Noonan| publisher=Wall Street Journal| date=December 17, 2003| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> ''[[National Catholic Reporter]]'' journalist [[John L. Allen, Jr.|John Allen]] published a similar account on the same day, quoting an unnamed senior Vatican official.<ref name="bare_url">{{cite news | url= http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word012304.htm| title= The Word From Rome | author= John L. Allen, Jr. | publisher= National Catholic Reporter | date=January 23, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> The following day, [[Reuters]] and the [[Associated Press]] each independently confirmed the story, citing Vatican sources.<ref name="bare_url" /><ref name="Peggy Noonan">{{cite news | url= http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004587| title= The story of the Vatican and Mel Gibson's film gets curiouser | author= Peggy Noonan| publisher=Wall Street Journal| date=January 22, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> On December 24, an anonymous Vatican official told [[Catholic News Service]], "There was no declaration, no judgment from the pope." On January 9, John Allen defended his earlier reporting, saying that his official source was adamant about the veracity of the original story.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word010904.htm|title= The Word From Rome | author= John L. Allen, Jr. | publisher= National Catholic Reporter|date=January 9, 2004|accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> In a January 18 column, [[Frank Rich]] interviewed the Italian translator who quoted Dziwisz as saying that the pope called the film "incredible" and said "it is as it was." Rich attacked the marketing of the film and suggested Dziwisz wielded too much influence over the pope. The next day Archbishop Dziwisz told CNS, "The Holy Father told no one his opinion of this film."<ref>{{cite news | last = Wooden | first = Cindy | coauthors = | title = Pope never commented on Gibson's 'Passion' film, says papal secretary | work = | pages = | language = | publisher = [[Catholic News Service]] | date=January 19, 2004 | url = http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/20040119.htm | accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref> This denial resulted in a round of commentators who accused the film producers of fabricating a papal quote to market their movie.
However, the [[Icon Productions]] spokesman stood by the story, and a source close to the situation said McEveety had asked for and received Vatican officials' permission to repeat the "It is as it was" statement before speaking to Noonan.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117898727.html?categoryid=13&cs=1| title= Did Pope really plug 'Passion'?| author= Gabriel Snyder| publisher=Daily Variety| date=January 19, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> Journalist [[Rod Dreher]] reported that McEveety had received an email from papal spokesman Dr. [[Joaquin Navarro-Valls]] on December 28, backing the Noonan account and ending: "I would try to make the words 'It is as it was' the [[Leitmotif|leit motive]] {{sic}} in any discusion {{sic}} on the film. Repeat the words again and again and again."<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/dn/opinion/columnists/rdreher/stories/012204dnedidreher.ebfd.html |title=Did the Vatican endorse Gibson's film – or didn't it?| author= Rod Dreher| publisher=Dallas Morning News| date=January 21, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-19 |archiveurl = http://osdir.com/ml/music.dadl.ot/2004-01/msg00784.html |archivedate=January 2004}}</ref>
Peggy Noonan had also received email confirmation of the quote from Navarro-Valls before writing her December 17 column. Complicating the situation, Navarro-Valls told Dreher that the email sent to McEveety was not genuine, suggesting it was fabricated. However, Noonan later verified that all of the Navarro-Valls emails came from the same Vatican IP address.<ref name="Peggy Noonan"/> The ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reported that they had previously confirmed the accuracy of the quote from Navarro-Valls when the story first broke. On CNN, [[John L. Allen, Jr.|John Allen]] reported Vatican sources who claim to have heard Dziwisz on other occasions affirm the accuracy of the quotation.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0401/21/lol.07.html| title= 'The Passion' Stirs Controversy at the Vatican | publisher= CNN transcript
| date=January 21, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref>
On January 22, Navarro-Valls released the following official statement: <blockquote>"The film is a cinematographic transposition of the historical event of the Passion of Jesus Christ according to the accounts of the Gospel. It is a common practice of the Holy Father not to express public opinions on artistic works, opinions that are always open to different evaluations of aesthetic character."<ref>{{cite news | url= http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word012304.htm| title= The Word From Rome.. | author= John L. Allen, Jr. | publisher= National Catholic Reporter | date=January 23, 2004 | accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref>
</blockquote>
===Allegations of antisemitism===
Before the film was even released, there were prominent criticisms of perceived [[antisemitism|antisemitic]] content in the movie. [[20th Century Fox]] told New York Assemblyman [[Dov Hikind]] they had passed on distributing the film in response to a protest outside the [[News Corp.]] building. Hikind warned other movie companies that "they should not distribute this film. This is unhealthy for Jews all over the world."<ref name=FOXpass />
A joint committee of the Secretariat for Ecumenical and Inter-religious Affairs of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Department of Inter-religious Affairs of the [[Anti-Defamation League]] obtained a version of the script before it was released in theaters. They released a statement, calling it <blockquote> one of the most troublesome texts, relative to anti-Semitic potential, that any of us had seen in twenty-five years. It must be emphasized that the main storyline presented Jesus as having been relentlessly pursued by an evil cabal of Jews, headed by the high priest [[Caiaphas]], who finally [[blackmail]]ed a weak-kneed [[Pontius Pilate|Pilate]] into putting Jesus to death. This is precisely the storyline that fueled centuries of anti-Semitism within Christian societies. This is also a storyline rejected by the Roman Catholic Church at [[Vatican II]] in its document ''[[Nostra Aetate]]'', and by nearly all mainline Protestant churches in parallel documents . . . . Unless this basic storyline has been altered by Mr. Gibson, a fringe Catholic who is building his own church in the Los Angeles area and who apparently accepts neither the teachings of Vatican II nor modern biblical scholarship, ''The Passion of the Christ'' retains a real potential for undermining the repudiation of classical Christian anti-Semitism by the churches in the last forty years.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Pawlikowski | first = John T. | title = Christian Anti-Semitism: Past History, Present Challenges Reflections in Light of Mel Gibson's ''The Passion of the Christ'' | journal = Journal of Religion and Film | date = February 2004 | url = http://www.unomaha.edu/jrf/2004Symposium/Pawlikowski.htm | accessdate = }}</ref></blockquote>
The ADL itself also released a statement about the yet to be released movie:
<blockquote>For filmmakers to do justice to the biblical accounts of the passion, they must complement their artistic vision with sound scholarship, which includes knowledge of how the passion accounts have been used historically to disparage and attack Jews and Judaism. Absent such scholarly and theological understanding, productions such as ''The Passion'' could likely falsify history and fuel the animus of those who hate Jews.<ref>{{cite press release | title = ADL Statement on Mel Gibson's 'The Passion' | publisher = [[Anti-Defamation League]] | date =June 24, 2003 | url = http://www.adl.org/presrele/mise_00/4275_00.asp | accessdate =2008-08-20 }}</ref></blockquote> [[Rabbi Daniel Lapin]], the head of the [[Toward Tradition]] organisation, criticized this statement, and said of Foxman, the head of the ADL, "what he is saying is that the only way to escape the wrath of Foxman is to repudiate your faith."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.forward.com/articles/6434/ | title="Passion" Critics Endanger Jews, Angry Rabbis Claim, Attacking Groups, Foxman | author=Nacha Cattan | publisher=The Jewish Daily Forward | date=March 5, 2004 }}</ref>
In ''[[The Nation]]'', reviewer [[Katha Pollitt]] said, "Gibson has violated just about every precept of the (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) conference's own 1988 "Criteria" for the portrayal of Jews in dramatizations of the Passion (no bloodthirsty Jews, no rabble, no use of Scripture that reinforces negative stereotypes of Jews, etc.) ... The priests have big noses and gnarly faces, lumpish bodies, yellow teeth; [[Herod Antipas]] and his court are a bizarre collection of oily-haired, [[epicene]] perverts. The "good Jews" look like Italian movie stars (Italian sex symbol [[Monica Bellucci]] is [[Mary Magdalene]]); Mary, who would have been around 50 and appeared 70, could pass for a ripe 35."<ref name="pollitt">{{cite news | last = Pollitt | first = Katha | coauthors = | title = The Protocols of Mel Gibson | work = | pages = | language = | publisher = ''[[The Nation]]'' | date=March 11, 2004 | url = http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040329/pollitt | accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref> [[Jesuit]] priest Fr. [[William Fulco]], S.J., of [[Loyola Marymount University]] – and the film's [[Aramaic language|Aramaic]] dialogue translator – specifically disagreed with that assessment, and disagreed with concerns that the film accused the Jewish community of [[deicide]].<ref>{{cite news | last = Wooden | first = Cindy | title = As filming ends, `Passion' strikes some nerves | publisher = ''[[National Catholic Reporter]]'' | date=May 2, 2003 | url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_26_39/ai_101680926 | accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref>
* One specific scene in the film perceived as an example of anti-Semitism was in the dialogue of Caiaphas, when he states "His blood [is] on us and on our children!", a quote historically interpreted by some as a curse taken upon by the Jewish people. Certain Jewish groups asked this be removed from the film. However, only the subtitles were removed; the original dialogue remains in the Aramaic soundtrack.<ref>{{cite news | last = Vermes | first = Geza | title = Celluloid brutality | publisher = ''[[The Guardian]]'' | date=February 27, 2003 | url = http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,4120,1157381,00.html | accessdate = 2008-08-20| location=London}}</ref> Additionally, the film's suggestion that the Temple's destruction was a direct result of the Jews' actions towards Jesus could also be interpreted as an offensive take on event which Jewish tradition views as a tragedy, and which is still mourned by many Jews today on the fast day of [[Tisha B'Av]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Markoe|first=Lauren|title=Tisha B'Av 2013: A New Approach To A Solemn Jewish Holiday|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/15/tisha-bav-2013_n_3599134.html|publisher=Huffington Post}}</ref>
When asked about this scene, Gibson said, "I wanted it in. My brother said I was wimping out if I didn't include it. But, man, if I included that in there, they'd be coming after me at my house. They'd come to kill me."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.seethepassion.com/article.php?id=21 | title=The Jesus War}}</ref> In another interview when asked about the scene, he said, "It's one little passage, and I believe it, but I don't and never have believed it refers to Jews, and implicates them in any sort of curse. It's directed at all of us, all men who were there, and all that came after. His blood is on us, and that's what Jesus wanted. But I finally had to admit that one of the reasons I felt strongly about keeping it, aside from the fact it's true, is that I didn't want to let someone else dictate what could or couldn't be said."<ref>{{cite news | title=Mel Gibson and Other "Passion" Filmakers say the Movie was Guided by Faith | publisher= Detroit Free Press | author=Terry Lawson | date=February 17, 2004}}</ref>
In the ''[[The New Republic|New Republic]]'', Leon Wieseltier said: "In its representation of its Jewish characters, ''The Passion of the Christ'' is without any doubt an anti-Semitic movie, and anybody who says otherwise knows nothing, or chooses to know nothing, about the visual history of anti-Semitism, in art and in film. What is so shocking about Gibson's Jews is how unreconstructed they are in their stereotypical appearances and actions. These are not merely anti-Semitic images; these are classically anti-Semitic images."<ref>{{cite web | url=https://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=20040308&s=wieseltier030804 | title=The Passion of the Christ | date=March 8, 2004 | author=Leon Wieseltier | publisher=The New Republic}}</ref>
Asked by [[Bill O’Reilly (commentator)|Bill O'Reilly]] if his movie would "upset Jews", Gibson responded, "It's not meant to. I think it's meant to just tell the truth. I want to be as truthful as possible."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101030127-409570,00.html | title=The Passion of Mel Gibson | work=Time | date=January 19, 2003 | accessdate=2010-05-25 | first=Richard | last=Corliss}}</ref> In a ''[[Globe and Mail]]'' newspaper interview, he added, "If anyone has distorted Gospel passages to rationalize cruelty towards Jews or anyone, it's in defiance of repeated Papal condemnation. The [[Papacy]] has condemned racism in any form... Jesus died for the sins of all times, and I'll be the first on the line for culpability".<ref>{{cite news | title=Mel Gibson Interview | publisher=Globe and Mail | date=February 14, 2004}}</ref>
Conservative columnist [[Cal Thomas]] also disagreed with allegations of anti-Semitism, saying "To those in the Jewish community who worry that the film ... might contain anti-Semitic elements, or encourage people to persecute Jews, fear not. The film does not indict Jews for the death of Jesus."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2003/08/05/the_greatest_story_ever_filmed | title=The Greatest Story Ever Filmed | publisher=TownHall.com | date=August 5, 2003 }}</ref> Two [[Orthodox Jew]]s, Rabbi Daniel Lapin and conservative talk-show host and author [[Michael Medved]], also vocally rejected claims that the film is anti-Semitic. They have noted the film's many sympathetic portrayals of Jews: [[Simon of Cyrene]] (who helps Jesus carry the cross), [[Mary Magdalene]], the [[Virgin Mary]], [[St. Peter]], [[John the Evangelist|St. John]], [[Saint Veronica|Veronica]] (who wipes Jesus' face and offers him water), and several Jewish priests who protest Jesus' arrest during [[Sanhedrin Trial of Jesus|Caiaphas' trial of Jesus]].
Bob Smithouser of Plugged in Online believed that film was trying to convey the evils and sins of humanity rather than specifically targeting Jews, stating "The anthropomorphic portrayal of Satan as a player in these events brilliantly pulls the proceedings into the supernatural realm – a fact that should have quelled the much-publicized cries of anti-Semitism since it shows a diabolical force at work beyond any political and religious agendas of the Jews and Romans."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.pluggedin.com/videos/2005/q1/passionofthechrist.aspx | title=The Passion of the Christ | publisher=Pluggedin.com }}</ref>
Moreover, Senior Vatican officer [[Darío Castrillón Hoyos|Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos]], who has seen the film, addressed the matter so:
<blockquote>Anti-Semitism, like all forms of racism, distorts the truth in order to put a whole race of people in a bad light. This film does nothing of the sort. It draws out from the historical objectivity of the Gospel narratives sentiments of forgiveness, mercy, and reconciliation. It captures the subtleties and the horror of sin, as well as the gentle power of love and forgiveness, without making or insinuating blanket condemnations against one group. This film expressed the exact opposite, that learning from the example of Christ, there should never be any more violence against any other human being.<ref>{{cite news | last = Gaspari | first = Antonio | title = The Cardinal & the ''Passion'' | publisher = [[National Review Online]] | date=September 18, 2003 | url = http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gaspari091803.asp | accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref></blockquote>
''[[South Park]]'' parodied the controversy in the episodes ''[[Good Times with Weapons]]'', ''[[Up the Down Steroid]]'', and ''[[The Passion of the Jew]]'' all aired just a few weeks after the film's release in March 2004.
===Allegation of excessive violence===
Several critics were troubled by the film's explicitly detailed violence, and especially cautioned parents to avoid taking their children to the cinema. Although only one sentence in three of the Gospels mentions [[Flagellation of Christ|Jesus's flogging]], and it is unmentioned in the fourth, ''The Passion of the Christ'' devotes ten minutes to the portrayal of the flogging. Film critic [[Roger Ebert]], who rated the movie four-out-of-four stars, said in his review:
<blockquote>The movie is 126 minutes long, and I would guess that at least 100 of those minutes, maybe more, are concerned specifically and graphically with the details of the torture and death of Jesus. This is the most violent film I have ever seen.<ref>Roger Ebert,[http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20040224%2FREVIEWS%2F402240301%2F1023&AID1=%2F20040224%2FREVIEWS%2F402240301%2F1023&AID2= ''The Passion of the Christ''] (review), February 24, 2004</ref></blockquote>
Ebert also mentioned that the R-rated film merits the [[MPAA]] NC-17 rating in a "Movie Answer Man" response, adding that no level-minded parent should ever allow children to see it.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040307/ANSWERMAN/403070305 |title="The Movie Answer Man", ''Chicago Sun-Times'', March 7, 2004 |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |date= |accessdate=2012-06-05}}</ref>
[[A. O. Scott]], in ''[[The New York Times]]'', said, "'The Passion of the Christ' is so relentlessly focused on the savagery of Jesus' final hours that this film seems to arise less from love than from wrath, and to succeed more in assaulting the spirit than in uplifting it." [[David Edelstein]], [[Slate Magazine|''Slate'']]'s film critic, dubbed the film "a two-hour-and-six-minute [[snuff film|snuff movie]] – ''The Jesus [[The Texas Chain Saw Massacre|Chainsaw Massacre]]'' – that thinks it's an act of faith", and further criticized Gibson for focusing on the brutality of Jesus' execution, instead of his religious teachings.<ref>{{cite web | title=Jesus H. Christ | author=David Edelstein| url=http://www.slate.com/id/2096025/ | publisher=Slate Magazine}}</ref>
During [[Diane Sawyer]]'s interview of him, Gibson said:
<blockquote>I wanted it to be shocking; and I wanted it to be extreme ... So that they see the enormity – the enormity of that sacrifice; to see that someone could endure that and still come back with love and forgiveness, even through extreme pain and suffering and ridicule. The actual crucifixion was more violent than what was shown on the film, but I thought no one would get anything out of it. </blockquote>
== რესურსები ინტერნეტში ==
|
